The Inn at
Langley, Whidbey Island, Wa, tasted on June 26, 2004 —
I grew up in Boston. And in Boston we had the Cape. Cape Cod to be
specific. But my home is now Seattle, and we have our own coastal
getaways - the Islands. And there are quite a few of them. Honestly
my expectations of the best food on Cape Cod are mostly around the
lobster rolls you can get from various roadside stands. Even
Martha's Vineyard and Nantucket don't necessarily get me excited in
terms of what restaurant food is available, though there are
certainly some farm stands that are fantastic. I guess my
expectations of the kind of food out in the islands off Seattle are
really not that different. Some nice fresh produce in season, some
local specialties, and that's good enough for me. But, last summer
we stayed at the
Inn at Langley, a super nice, Pacific Northwest archetypal inn.
And somehow they managed to grab an accomplished Seattle chef -
Matt Costello - to move out to the island, and cook in their
restaurant. And while we were out there, I could understand the
attraction. A small restaurant, sources for local ingredients,
seasonal work, a beautiful locale, and operating at a scale that
lets the chef really control many more variables than they might in
a city restaurant. This could be interesting.
We started off checking out the
wine list. At first we were put off that there weren't any wines by
the glass. When there's only two of us we simply can't finish most of a
bottle of wine. (For anyone confused by this it's mostly my fault as I
fall asleep by the end of the second glass.) But then I noticed that
they had a decent selection of half bottles. And the logic of this
became evident. I'd rather have the wine fresh out of a newly opened
bottle, than have a glass from last night's half-finished bottle. Cool.
We got the
NV Henriot Champagne Brut that was recommended by the chef. Frankly,
we loved it. The bubbles were fine, and the flavor super creamy. It had
the aroma of butter. On that night it felt like a 96 point Champagne to
me.
As we savored our champagne,
Chef Costello spent some time addressing the diners who were all
going to be eating the same tasting menu on the same schedule. One
seating, one menu, simple simple simple. He talked to us for awhile
about Whidbey Island terroir. OK. I admit it, I hadn't thought about
Whidbey Island as really being a source for various unique ingredients
or particular types of items that can make a dish stand out. But in
truth, I really know crap about where I live, and Washington state is
actually quite agricultural. And apparently, the chef had spent quite
some time scouring the island and getting to know the local farmers and
producers. So I figured, as long as the quality of the food supported
the promises of the narrative then we'd be in good shape. And we were.
First up was the amuse -
Cardamom Squab on Balsamic Cherries and Sweet Corn with Fresh Corn
Shoots. This was simply excellent. Sizable slices of squab
with both the sweet tones of the cherries and sweet flavors of the corn
each having their own unique space but but still complementary. The
squab was juicy and savory and the corn shoots were new to me. The corn
itself as the base flavor was foundational to the dish and really made
it whole. Debbie pointed out that every every element in the amuse had
some hits in the sweetness spectrum but there were many other flavors
present as well.
Next up was
Fresh Shell Pea Soup with Lemon Crème Fraiche and Penn Cove Mussels.
This pea soup was different than any other I've ever had. It had a light
texture (and some hints of the flavor) of of avoglemono (no doubt due to
the lemon crème fraiche. While mussels have never been my favorite they
are indeed growing on me, and these in particular added a light savory
component to the dish and they were not overly chewy. Some yummy bread
came out at this point. It was served hot and there was a variety.
Debbie approved
wholeheartedly of the fact that the
butter was not served ice cold. She prefers it to sit out and get a
little softer before it arrives at the table. And just to prove that you
can't please everyone, I actually don't like it too soft. In fact,
especially with hot rolls, I like the butter kind of cold so I can get
the temperature contrasts in my mouth.
Apparently our palates were due for some calming as a
Trio of Gazpacho Inspired Sorbets showed up next. I wondered if they
would be more "shticky" than yummy but in fact they were cleansing,
refreshing, and simple. The cucumber was subtle while the saffron
surprisingly, strong and good. My favorite was the tomato as it had an
incredibly deep, fresh, and almost citrusy tomato goodness. Excellent!
We munched some more on the bread and had some of the
best potato bread ever. It was subtle but flavorful - and had just
the right amount of salt.
We had a pair of entrees. The
Seared Black Cod on Crushed New Potatoes with Wild Morels and Tomatoes
and the
Muscovy Duck Breast with Plum-Foie Gras Tart Tatin and Dandelion Greens.
The cod was light, buttery in flavor and texture, and had a crispy
outside. Yummy. The duck was very very good. I wished for it to be
cooked slightly rarer, but Debbie thought it was perfect. This is one of
those judgment calls. And often I wonder if chefs make certain decisions
as they know the bulk of their customers would send back duck that they
considered underdone (even though in my opinion it would be perfect).
But I shouldn't assume as I don't really know. And after all, Debbie is
not exactly an inexperienced diner and she likes her meat on the rare
side, and she thought the duck was just right. The dish also had
surprising tart flavors which added a ton to the salty/savory duck
crust. Again we noticed that Costello used sweet flavors well. I'm not
usually a fan of a lot of sweetness but in these dishes it was neither
syrupy nor cloying. Debbie also thought the spinach was very well
prepared. I agree as it retained those essential fresh spinach tones.
The entrees were too big for my taste, but then again they always are.
I'm just a small plate guy. I get tired of a dish when there's too much.
And if I had one other nit to offer it would be that the duck dish
advertised foie gras but I couldn't find any. I have no doubt it was
there, I just wonder if it's wrong of me to feel that foie gras in
particular shouldn't be mentioned in the name of a dish if it's not
really featured in a way I will notice. This may be short-sighted
thinking on my part, or just testament to my deep and abiding love for
foie gras.
The cheese course was surprisingly good. It was
Delice De Bourgogne cheese with Candied Baby Beets, Bronze Fennel and
Orange. I knew this cheese well and have eaten it many times. The
beets, fennel, and orange formed an excellent combination. There's
something about finding three flavors that go well together that has a
sort of natural harmony and just strongly resonates with me when it's
done really well. Maybe it's the odd number of ingredients, or the
different combinations that can happen in your mouth. Whatever it is,
when a chef balances three flavors really well (no more, no less) I find
myself particularly moved. Debbie thought the beets were the perfect
complement to the cheese. And I couldn't help but notice that it was
really more than a cheese course. I liked that the cheese shared the
stage with other items. Sometimes a cheese course can be overwhelming
and this was really an enjoyable dish. Things finished up with a lovely
Washington Cherry Sorbet with Cherry-Almond Strudel and White Chocolate.
I have always thought that scale is the enemy of
quality. The best chefs can make excellent food consistently for a
reasonable number of diners each night. Unfortunately many of them try
to scale beyond even that opening multiple restaurants and putting their
name on frozen food. This is the point at which I usually wonder why the
hell I'm eating their food. It's not that I'm offended by someone trying
to build a business. Believe me, I'm not. It's that almost always the
expansion comes at the cost of the qualities that made the chef (and now
the brand) special. At one point in the meal that I couldn't help but
notice that the pacing was really great. This was all the more
impressive as Costello appeared to be doing 98% of the cooking all by
himself. His
staff was doing some of the plating, but he was basically
single-handedly feeding 22 people (I counted) in the restaurant all
eating at once. Now there are ways to make this possible. All 22 people
were eating the same menu. And the menu was no doubt designed so as much
as possible could be made in advance. His staff also clearly were
playing key support roles not only serving but doing some of the plating
as well. Now while I don't know what was on Chef Costello's mind when he
decided to leave being a chef in Seattle for essentially a part-time gig
out on the island, I can't help but think he carefully scaled down
his efforts so that he could exert even more control on the food he
creates and serves to customers. And ultimately this seems like quite
the opposite of what most chefs are doing, and unsurprisingly has the
opposite effect. By scaling down his efforts, he can focus even more on
every detail of the food we were eating. And it showed in the attention
to detail, and the consistency of the vision throughout the meal. I know
the words simple, fresh, and seasonal are overused to the point of being
meaningless, but they really did ring true for this meal. I'm excited to
go back.